jQuery Mobile Framework
Search Home >> American Standards >> American Society for Testing Material (ASTM) >> ASTM E569/E569M-2013 Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation

ASTM E569/E569M-2013 Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation

Standard Number:  ASTM E569/E569M-2013
Title:  Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation
Language:  English
Replacing Standard:  ASTM E569-07

Execute Date:  2013/1/1
Status:  
Publisher:  American Society for Testing Material (ASTM)
Price:  
Number of Pages:5P.;A4  

Description:5. Significance and UseTop Bottom

5.1 Controlled stimulation i.e. the application of mechanical or thermal load, can generate AE from flawed areas of the structure. Sources may include flaw growth, oxide fracture, crack face stiction and release on load application, and crack face rubbing.

5.2 The load range above normal service (peak) load is used to propagate fatigue cracks in the plastically strained region ahead of the crack tip. Crack propagation may not be a reliable source of AE, depending on the alloy and microstructure, the amount (rate) of crack extension, and possibility of brittle fracture in a segment of crack extension.

5.3 Load increases resulting in significant ductile tearing may produce less emission than expected for the amount of crack growth. Processes that result in more brittle cleavage fractures are more detectable and produce more emission for smaller amounts of flaw growth. These include corrosion fatigue and stress corrosion cracking modes of flaw growth, and would also be more likely in cast or welded structures than in fabricated (forged, rolled or extruded) structures. Distributed defect structures such as hydrogen embrittlement, or creep cavitation in high temperature steels may also produce significant emission without evidence of an existing crack-like flaw.

5.4 Application and relaxation of load can produce secondary mechanically-induced emission that is not related to flaw extension. This includes crack face stiction release on loadingsually evidenced by emission at the same rising load value regardless of peak load; or crack face rubbing on load release as the fracture surfaces come back together.

5.5 The load rate can be a significant concern as instrumentation can become saturated with AE activity. The ability to differentiate real data from background noise can be compromised.

5.6 Background noise must be fully investigated and minimized before any AE monitoring can begin.

1.1 This practice provides guidelines for acoustic emission (AE) monitoring of structures, such as pressure vessels, piping systems, or other structures that can be stressed by mechanical or thermal means.

1.2 The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of reported acoustic emission sources.

1.3 Units?/i>The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standards.

1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropria......  

File Format:  PDF(Acrobat Reader) or Word version doc Document
File Size:  726KB
Tile in English:  Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation

Full Text Information

Related

Top 10

New 10